Re: Subtyping and Subclassing, again

Park SungWoo (gladius@compiler.kaist.ac.kr)
Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:43:28 +0900 (KST)

> But definetely part of our proposal must be
> a class hierarchy for standard nodes. If we have
> reached a consensus on inheritance (see my next
> mail). Is there someone willing to
> encode a preliminary hierarchy in the new
> syntax? Any volunteers? You could use the

I have no idea about what you wish exactly.
Is that naturally included in developing the parser
of our GREAT new language ? Then, my answer is not
"I am willing to encode it", but "I must encode it".
I wish your further explantion on the work.

> above mentioned VRML++ file as a starting
> point. So you don't have to enter CLASS
> definitions for all the special nodes
> without any interesting type restrictions.
>
> BTW "BTW" means "by the way".

Thanks.

> 

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 Sungwoo Park, (Castle-Help Naive)
	homepage : http://compiler.kaist.ac.kr/~gladius
 	e-mail : gladius@compiler.kaist.ac.kr
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -